Decide what deserves commitment in your portfolio.

Not every investment or initiative can proceed. TransparentChoice helps leadership structure and test the choice of what to fund, defer, stop or review.

Does this sound familiar?

  • Priorities, funding or capacity can change, but existing commitments don't automatically change with them.
  • Every initiative can have a legitimate case. The harder question is which ones deserve scarce funding and capacity under today's priorities and constraints.

The Decision Framework makes leadership judgement and the logic behind the choice explicit and testable. Portfolio Software connects that logic to real constraints and realistic portfolio choices. When useful, Expert Support helps leaders examine the trade-offs. Leadership owns the final decision.

Clarify the decision leadership needs to make and the most practical next step.

Need an ongoing portfolio decision capability? Explore the software → Includes a deep-dive demo with a former PMI Chair.

Why add TransparentChoice to what you already have?

You may already have capable tools, analysts and processes for portfolio decisions. TransparentChoice adds a focused decision capability alongside them.

You already have PPM or SPM

Keep your PPM in place for the work you rely on it to do.

Add TransparentChoice when making a consequential choice would require reworking your existing PPM setup.

It helps leadership structure the decision, apply shared constraints and compare complete portfolio choices without reworking the PPM around the decision.

Your team can build the analysis

A capable team can build sophisticated portfolio analysis with Excel, BI, scripts and workshops.

Add TransparentChoice when the decision needs multiple rounds of iteration without rebuilding the analysis each time.

It lets leadership change priorities, assumptions or constraints and see how the portfolio responds.

Your current process usually works

Keep it if it produces good-enough decisions.

Add TransparentChoice when leadership needs to reconsider commitments across the portfolio, not initiative by initiative.

It helps leaders compare feasible portfolio alternatives and decide what stays, what gives way and why.

HOW TRANSPARENTCHOICE CREATES REAL PORTFOLIO CHANGE

From leadership judgement to a portfolio decision

Making priorities explicit is not enough for a consequential portfolio decision. Before leadership commits, TransparentChoice provides a structured way to connect that judgement to real constraints and portfolio choices.

  1. Make priorities explicit

    Capture leadership judgement, test it for consistency, and make meaningful disagreement visible.

  2. Build portfolio choices

    Compare initiatives consistently, then apply funding, capacity and other constraints to compare complete, feasible portfolio choices side by side.

  3. Make the trade-offs

    Weigh the trade-offs between credible portfolio choices, then decide what to fund, defer, stop or review.

Your leaders provide the judgement and own the final decision. TransparentChoice brings the decision framework and software to make the judgement, constraints and trade-offs behind the choice explicit and open to examination. When useful, our experts can help leaders work through the trade-offs. The Portfolio Decision Sprint offers a focused way to start with one defined portfolio decision.

Facing a difficult investment or portfolio decision?

Give leadership credible choices on what to fund, defer or stop.