Optimize Project Flow: Make projects go faster by slowing down!
My son has recently taken up running. I keep telling him to pace himself, but he doesn’t. He blasts out and, after a couple of hundred meters, has to walk for a bit. Then he’s off again.
He gets to the end. He’s exhausted and his dear old dad is already there, waiting for him.
Did dad sprint? No, I certainly did not!
I ran steadily and slowly, but I beat him.
How did an overweight, middle-aged guy beat his teenage son? Well, I know something that he doesn’t. I know a little about the theory of constraints. And what I know can transform your project delivery flow.
Where Project Flow Breaks Down
Most of what I know about the theory of constraints I learned from Mike Hannan. Mike is a recognised expert in applying theory of constraints to project delivery. It’s not unusual for his customers to double, triple, or even quadruple their project throughput.
We recently had Mike run a short webinar outlining the key concepts. You can watch the full session at the bottom of this blog, or the short video below for a concentrated version.
The key point is simple. The flow of projects, water, or even oxygen when you are running is limited by the bottlenecks in the system. When you try to exceed the capacity of that bottleneck, overall flow slows down rather than speeding up.
These are the same constraints and flow challenges we see when working with portfolios in practice. Learn more about the TransparentChoice portfolio fixing approach.
In the clip, Mike shows a clear example using water flowing out of a bottle.
Why Maximising Utilisation Slows Delivery
So you are a PMO. You have 200 project resources, but their utilization rate is only 50 percent.
It feels obvious how to increase project flow. Add more projects and drive up utilization.
That works for a while. Then something unexpected happens. Flow starts to slow down. This screenshot from the webinar shows the effect.

The graph shows something most organisations miss. The point where you maximise flow is not the same as the point where you maximise utilisation. If you are operating on the right-hand side of the curve, reducing the load slightly will actually increase the number of projects completed.
Coming back to the running metaphor, slowing down allows you to keep going. You reach the finish line sooner because you do not burn out halfway there.
What Happens When You Reduce the Load
Most organisations operate on the right-hand side of the curve, well beyond the peak. What is often missed is that the same level of project flow could be achieved with significantly less effort.

This is another screenshot from the webinar, and it raises a simple question. Where would you rather operate?
- On the right-hand side, with teams under constant pressure
- On the left-hand side, with more breathing room and the same level of delivery
- At the peak, where effort and output are in balance and flow is maximised
For most organisations, the answer is obvious once the trade-off is made explicit.
Why Prioritisation Determines Value
Not all projects are created equal, and the business does not care how many projects you complete. What matters is the value you deliver.
Every organisation has a practical limit to how much work it can push through the system. You can improve that limit over time, but there is always a ceiling.
This is where prioritisation matters. It is how you ensure that limited capacity is spent on the work that creates the most impact. When capacity is constrained, the choice of which projects move forward determines how much value flows through the portfolio.
There are effective and ineffective ways to approach project prioritisation. I will not go into that here, but if you want to explore what good looks like in practice, you can see our Ultimate Guide to Project Prioritization.
Putting It All Together
In summary, do not make the same mistake my son makes when he runs. Pushing flat out all the time feels productive, but it slows progress overall.
Capacity is limited. The challenge is to deliver the maximum business value from the capacity you already have. That comes down to three practical steps.
- Prioritise the projects that matter most
- Set a project load that maximises throughput for your organisation
- Then work deliberately to increase your maximum flow over time
Webinar: The Most Valuable Portfolio Management Skill They Never Taught You
Michael Hannan of Fortezza Consulting shares a practical technique that helps PMOs move from activity to impact. He explains the cycle many PMO environments get stuck in and shows how leadership decisions can shift that cycle in a more productive direction.
The presentation introduces a more mission-driven set of performance measures, challenges common assumptions around consistency and compliance, and explains a simple technique organisations can use to get closer to their true potential.
Mike is a highly experienced consultant and author with a long track record of helping organisations improve portfolio outcomes. If you want a deeper dive into the ideas behind project flow and constraints, the webinar is well worth watching.
From Insight to Action
The patterns described in this article are not theoretical. We see the same bottlenecks, overload, and prioritisation challenges in most portfolios we work with. Teams are busy, utilisation looks high, and yet progress feels slower than it should.
The first step is not a tool, a framework, or a big transformation. It is simply taking a clear, objective look at where work is getting stuck and which decisions are limiting flow.
That is what this conversation is for. It is a short, practical discussion to sense-check your current portfolio, identify the real constraints, and explore whether there is headroom to deliver more value without pushing people harder.
There is no obligation, no sales pitch, and no expectation that you already have the answers. Most leaders use this session to validate what they already suspect and leave with a clearer view of their options.
If your portfolio feels overloaded and progress is not matching the effort being invested, this is a low-risk way to understand why.